Louisiana Supreme Court tosses challenge to Constitutional Amendment 2, thereby confirming AG Murrill’s contention that the litigation was “frivolous;” We reiterate our “full-throttled support” for that Amendment.

Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, who successfully sought the Louisiana Supreme Court to intervene in a lawsuit brought about by three plaintiffs represented by attorney William Most who sought to block Louisiana citizens from being able to vote on Constitutional Amendment Two (2) on Saturday, March 29, 2025.

It was only four (4) days ago that we published this feature  revealing the fact that Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill characterized the litigation seeking to block Proposed Constitutional Amendment Two (2) from going to a vote of the people as “frivolous.”

We also indicated the Amendment has our “full-throttled support.”

Late yesterday evening (Tuesday, March 18, 2025), the Louisiana Supreme Court tossed that litigation with prejudice (meaning the Plaintiffs may not reinitiate the litigation).

In today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature, founder Robert Burns focuses in on the Supreme Court’s ruling last night and reiterates our “full-throttled support” for Constitutional Amendment Two (2) on the ballot for the March 29, 2025 election:

3/19/25:  Burns coves the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling late yesterday tossing the legal challenge to Proposed Constitutional Amendment Two (2) on the ballot of Saturday, March 29, 2025.

We stress on the video that, contrary to attorney William Most’s apparent belief that Louisiana citizens lack the ability to, as Burns states it, “do their homework” and thereby make educated votes on the Proposed Amendment, modern technology permits a plethora of opportunities to become very well informed on the contents of all four (4) Amendment Proposals.

To that end, let us again reference this Advocate article for an in-depth overview of the Proposed Amendments.

Further, as Burns stresses on the video, we are going to provide Dr. Steven Procopio, President of the Public Affairs Research Council  providing an in-depth presentation of Proposed Amendment Two (2) which he provided to the Baton Rouge Press Club on Monday, February 24, 2025.  We will note that we would have already done so, but we’ve had to waste valuable time and energy covering Most’s “frivolous” lawsuit.  Here’s video coverage of Procopio’s coverage of Proposed Amendment Two (2) only:

2/24/25:  Procopio provides an in-depth presentation of Proposed Amendment Two (2) on the ballot for March 29, 2025.  [Note:  the ONLY items we edited out of Procopio’s feature is one (1) question which he declined to answer because he indicated it would require him taking a position on the Amendment — rather than just providing information — and several questions entailing the litigation on the matter, which is now moot in light of yesterday evening’s Louisiana Supreme Court ruling].

We are about to present a mere 32-second excerpt from Procopio’s presentation which Sound Off Louisiana passionately believes is absolutely critical for Louisiana’s economic advancement and one of the biggest reasons we so strongly advocate for passage of the Proposed Amendment.  Here is that 32-second segment:

2/24/25:  Procopio provides what we passionately believe is one of the biggest reasons Proposed Constitutional Amendment Two (2) needs to pass on Saturday, March 29, 2025.

CLICK HERE for Procopio’s presentation in its entirety to include all four (4) Proposed Constitutional Amendments.

So, we conclude this feature by strongly commending Attorney General Liz Murrill for her tenacity in getting the lawsuit stopped dead in its tracks, as we also do to the Louisiana Supreme Court for stopping it dead in its tracks!

We believe the plethora of material by which voters can educate themselves on whether they support or oppose each of the four (4) Proposed Amendments does in fact make Most’s litigation “frivolous;” furthermore, it’s the rationale behind Burns stating on the first video above that the lawsuit constituted a, “slap in the face” to Louisiana voters because of its insulting premise that we don’t know how to educate ourselves on matters such as this!

 

2 thoughts on “Louisiana Supreme Court tosses challenge to Constitutional Amendment 2, thereby confirming AG Murrill’s contention that the litigation was “frivolous;” We reiterate our “full-throttled support” for that Amendment.”

  1. No way am I voting for this tripe. They lumped multiple bad ideas with the good to confuse the public and it looks like the same old crap. Landry the clownfish is a doofus and moron for allowing this travesty of a ballot. Are you now on the bandwagon Sir? Have they fed you the koolaid? Sad Robert. You too are paid to talk.

    1. Ms. Gormund:

      Thank you for your comment. Although they are increasing in number, this blog has traditionally gotten few comments, so we welcome any comments from any side expressing any viewpoint.

      Having said that, I am hopeful that your opposition to Constitutional Amendment # 2 is based on more research than you have conducted on me because that seems to be precious little, and I would even submit none at all.

      When I founded this blog, I made it clear (and have reiterated it numerous times), that I would not accept any advertising, would accept no contributions whatsoever, and I have maintained that for the almost 10-year history of this blog.

      When I make trips such as this one to Farmerville to report on the Ronald Greene developments,
      https://www.soundoffla.com/camera/
      that entire expenditure is paid by Robert Burns! Nobody else contributes one single dime to my expenditures, and I can promise you that the costs (especially of obtaining court filings at $1/page) have added up!

      Secondly, I have no hesitation to call Gov. Landry on the carpet when I feel he has engaged in what I deem to be indefensible actions, such as the case here:
      https://www.soundoffla.com/sguidrytwo/

      I will point out, however, that, when I have done so (and I could supply quite a few more links), I have gone to great lengths via public records requests to enable me to provide the documentation to back up my contentions. As a result, nobody has successfully challenged the contentions that I make entailing Landry.

      This blog is named Sound Off Louisiana for a reason. If you would like to “Sound Off” entailing your opposition to Constitutional Amendment Two (2), feel free to contact me, and we will set it up. Please be aware, however, that I expect you to have conducted your diligence (i.e. specify the “good” and the “bad” and why the “bad” apparently outweighs the “good” from your prospective). In other words, I expect more than the childish name calling in which you have engaged in your comment above.

      Finally, for the record, I have consumed nobody’s “Kool-Aid.”

      Let me know if you wish to take me up on my offer to appear on Sound Off Louisiana and, if so, I look forward to meeting you!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.