Gov. Landry, Sec. Nelson, Rep. Emerson, despite media reports to the contrary, just showered lower-income Louisiana residents with a massive tax cut, and we authoritatively demonstrate that fact on the video for this feature.

Louisiana State Sen. Blake Miguez, during Senate consideration  of Gov. Landry’s tax reform package on Friday, November 22, 2024, makes absolutely certain that, in the finalized tax reform package, none of the original 40+ activities outlined at the outset of the tax reform package would entail folk who have never had to collect sales taxes suddenly having to do so.

——————————-

ADDENDUM (11/29/24 @ 5:28 p.m.).

Regrettably the computations in this feature are erroneous.  Please refer to this mea culpa feature for much more accurate computations.

——————————

 

In today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature, founder Robert Burns demonstrates that, notwithstanding mainstream media coverage (along with coverage by other platforms), Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry’s tax reform package entailed massive tax relief for lower-income Louisiana citizens and was most certainly not reform tilted exclusively to higher-income Louisiana residents.  Here’s the video authoritatively demonstrating that fact:

 11/24/24:  Video demonstrating exactly how Gov. Landry’s tax reform package is a huge win for lower-income Louisiana taxpayers.

As mentioned on the video (and as seen in text displays on the video), here are the computations demonstrating the tax savings for a single taxpayer with $35,000 in income in Louisiana:

1.  Tax savings from elimination of lowest income tax bracket:  $12,500 x 0.0185 = $231.25.

2.  Tax savings from increasing Standard Deduction from $4,500 to $12,000:  $8,000 x 0.035 = $280.

3.  Combined tax savings:  $231.25 + $280 = $511.25.

4.  Amount of spending taxpayer would have to do in paying added sales taxes for the income tax savings to be wiped out:  $511.25 / 0.0055 = $92,954.55.

Obviously, common sense dictates that someone making $35,000 a year cannot spend $92,954.55 and, as Burns stated, what makes the whole plan work is taught in college economics classes, and what that entails is the velocity of money.

As indicated in the video above, if anyone is so inclined, our camera is readily available for anyone who may wish to refute Burns’ assessment of Landry et. al.’s tax package, but just be prepared to demonstrate via numbers as Burns did and not do as so many media outlets did during the duration of coverage of Landry’s plan and present nothing more than emotion or, in at least a couple of reports we saw, nothing short of made up numbers!

Lastly, as demonstrated in the video above, Sen. Blake Miguez sought to make absolutely certain that everyone (most especially folk in his Senate District) is aware that none (zero, zilch, nada) of the 40+ activities specified in HB-9 are in the current legislation which just passed that would have required folk who’ve never had to collect sales taxes in the past to commence doing so.  Here’s that video (which is also incorporated into the video above):

11/22/24:  Sen. Migeuz goes out of his way to make sure folk back home in his Senate District know that none of the activities originally listed in HB-9 (40+ activities originally) are in the final package passed and thus nobody who wasn’t already collecting sales taxes would have to start doing so.

Finally, as indicated in the initial video above, here is our updated table of Gov. Landry et. al..’s tax package (Note:  HB-9 is now gone, and the original HB-1 was fully merged into HB-10):

Legislation (as broadly amended)Total Estimated 5-Year Fiscal Impact and Votes [numbers in parenthesis ( ) represent negative impacts on Louisiana's finances and numbers not in parenthesis represent positive impacts on Louisiana fiscal affairs, i.e. typically more tax revenue.]
HB-2. Lowers corporate tax rate from 7.5% to 5.5%.($29 million). [VERY heavily front-end loaded due to exemptions which can still be claimed for a couple more years but which will expire in later years, at which time significant positive cash flow impacts are expected (see yearly breakdown on linked fiscal note above). That fact cannot be sufficiently stressed due to its importance in offsetting lost revenue from eliminating Corporate Franchise Tax (see next bill)]. Votes.
HB-3. Repeals corporate franchise tax.($1.9 billion). Votes.
HB-4. Appropriates supplemental funding for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. Provides for net increases out of Statutory Dedications by $3,481,010. This is the cost of March 29, 2025 special election for Constitutional Amendment.No Impact. Votes.
HB-5. Funds $2,000 PERMANENT (not a stipend contingent on annual Legislative approval) teacher pay raise via paydown of Teacher Retirement Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL).No impact. Votes.
HB-6. Calls for Special Election on March 29, 2025 for Constitutional Amendment.($3 million) Cost to conduct March 29, 2025 special election for Constitutional Amendment. Votes.
HB-7 Constitutional amendment to be voted upon by voters on 3/29/25 which covers considerable ground, but the main features are the $2,000/year teacher pay raise and providing an added Standard Deduction for Louisiana Taxpayers who are 65+, upping that Deduction to $25,000.
(In the range of $850 million). Vast majority comes from Statutory Dedications, so no meaningful impact on state general fund operations. Votes.
HB-8. Levies a tax on certain digital services (Netflix, etc.)$169 million. Votes.
HB-10. [Fully absorbs former HB-1]. As per our suggestion of 11/16/24, extends "clean penny" sales tax [for five (5) years]. Also compresses three personal income tax brackets into one 3% bracket and ELIMINATES THE LOWEST TAX BRACKET FOR ALL TAXPAYERS IN THE PROCESS. Further, increases the Standard Deduction from $4,500 to $12,500.$417 million.

Votes: HB-1 (pre merger);

HB-10.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.